How legit.build works
The claim, not the proof
We do not run builds and we do not prove a build is honest. We record independent claims that a project release builds to a given binary hash, and surface where builders agree and where they diverge. Trust comes from N-of-M corroboration across identities, not from any single attestation.
Build it yourself
Start a session, pick projects, and paste one line into your coding agent. It builds each project against a pinned, deterministic recipe and reports the binary hash back here live. You review every result and sign only what you approve.
Two ways to attest
- Wallet: you sign one gas-free EAS off-chain attestation covering the whole batch. Self-sovereign; identity shown via ENS / Farcaster.
- Twitter: you authenticate with X and our backend (a trusted issuer) signs on your behalf, recording your handle.
On-chain publishing (a Base timestamp anchor, and opt-in full on-chain attestations) is coming later; v1 is off-chain.
Architecture cohorts
Builders report whatever architecture they built on. Hashes are only comparable within the same os/arch, so a release page groups attestations by architecture first and flags divergence only within a cohort. Different hashes across architectures are expected.